[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Getting 2822 to Draft

2004-01-02 08:06:16

Would 2822bis obsolete 822 fully?  If so, I believe it should mention
what happened to the X- header prefix that was part of 822.  I don't
believe simply removing them without stating why is a good idea,
people can draw many different conclusions from that, which affect
real implementations.

some people think X- headers are extremely useful, others think they were a bad mistake that should be eradicated. maybe we need a separate RFC about X- fields. I'd hate to see this argument block progression of 2822 bis.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>