Re: Getting 2822 to Draft

Pete Resnick <presnick(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> writes:

> Comments?
Would 2822bis obsolete 822 fully?  If so, I believe it should mention
what happened to the X- header prefix that was part of 822.  I don't
believe simply removing them without stating why is a good idea,
people can draw many different conclusions from that, which affect
real implementations.

Thanks,
Simon