Re: X-* header fields

Al Costanzo wrote:

> A clean, simple, fast way to register the non X- header field would do the
> trick..
>
> Al
>  
Is that possible? Ignoring "fast" for the moment, my definition of
"clean" is that the
registration requires specification of semantics and syntax, including ABNF.

That may conflict with somebody else's definition of "simple".