Pete Resnick wrote:
So, for the new year I started thinking about getting 2822 to Draft.
(Also, 3822 is coming up in the RFC numbers :-) ). I've gotten started
on getting a new draft together. There are a small bunch of nits to
fix; that I can handle. There's also an implementation report to
write. On that I'd like to get some help.
The one possible big thing has to do with the ABNF in 2822. Out of
either altruism or insanity, some time ago Bruce Lilly had written up
changes to the ABNF in 2822 to do some cool things. On the plus side,
it seems to get rid of all of the [C]FWS shift-reduce conflicts, and
it is already done. On the minus side, I don't know anyone (myself
included) who has gone over it with a fine tooth comb, it is a
significant number of ABNF changes, and it therefore might recycle us
at Proposed. I am open to suggestions on this.
Comments?
pr
As
a) 2821 and 2822 are closely related
and
b) there remain a few inconsistencies between 2821 and 2822
is there a draft of a 2821 successor that can be reviewed at the same time
as the draft of the 2822 successor?
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################