[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar

2004-01-16 02:24:52

Pete Resnick writes:
2. I think I found a case in which Bruce permits CFWS where it wasn't before, although I cannot decipher my very cramped margin notes. It was something like "To: blah: (cfws) a(_at_)b(_dot_)org;".

2822 allows CFWS there.

Yes, it was something like that. I remember I thought it was a really odd case. I'll see if I can find it again when the jetlag's gone.

Anyway, now that you've cleared up the things I misunderstood or didn't understand, I like Bruce's changes even better. (Thanks, Bruce.)