Re: Revisiting RFC 2822 grammar

Pete Resnick writes:
> > 2. I think I found a case in which Bruce permits CFWS where it wasn't 
> >  before, although I cannot decipher my very cramped margin notes. It 
> > was something like "To: blah: (cfws) a(_at_)b(_dot_)org;".
> 2822 allows CFWS there.
Yes, it was something like that. I remember I thought it was a really 
odd case. I'll see if I can find it again when the jetlag's gone.
Anyway, now that you've cleared up the things I misunderstood or didn't 
understand, I like Bruce's changes even better. (Thanks, Bruce.)
Arnt