Re: Understanding response protocols

Charles Lindsey writes:
> No, what I have proposed still falls withint the existing syntax of 
> <address>. Granted it is not the prettiest of solutions, it is still 
> better tnat no solution at all. You have a better one?
Do you think it is better once all those fun-loving translators have 
been at it? We've seen "Re" mutate into dozens of translated prefixes. 
I see no reason to think that your proposed keyword would escape the 
fate of Re.
Arnt