On Fri October 22 2004 07:54, Charles Lindsey wrote:
But once the domain name has been copied into the id-right
There is no "copying" involved; RFC 2822 recommends that
id-right *be* a domain name, full stop.
(whether in
upper or lower case) it is no longer a domain name for any protocol
purpose.
Says who? Certainly not RFC 2822.
its only purpose is to be compared for identity
with other <id-right>s for the removal of duplicates, for threading, etc.
No, Charles; the original message in this discussion mentioned
content identifiers, which explicitly use RFC 822 syntax. There
was no mention of "removal of duplicates" or "threading" or
anything vaguely similar.
No, there are no such circumstances, and you have explained none, in spite
of being asked to do so
Several have been provided; the messages were sent to this
mailing list and to you. The message headers in the copies
in this mailing lists archives bear that out.
Nobody gives a damn whether an <id-right> is a domain or not.
Yet another unsubstantiated Lindsey blanket claim. As is
typical of those, it is false.
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################