[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Experiment #3 with multiple Reference headers

2005-01-26 05:39:12

In <tFXxIsHlJN/+6084uu/YOw(_dot_)md5(_at_)libertango(_dot_)oryx(_dot_)com> Arnt 
Gulbrandsen <arnt(_at_)gulbrandsen(_dot_)priv(_dot_)no> writes:

Charles Lindsey writes:

But all the reports so far (not a representtive sample, to be sure) 
indicate that no harm arises from multiple References headers (i.e. 
they progagate, and are interpreted as well as could be hoped for).

(The software on your own machine is an exception, in that it didn't 
propagate the field.)

No, that is not correct. It failed to let it out as a newly generated
message. It is, and was, perfectly happy to receive such messages arriving
from outside, as it did when my 2nd and 3rd attempts came back from the

Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web:
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, 
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>