In <tFXxIsHlJN/+6084uu/YOw(_dot_)md5(_at_)libertango(_dot_)oryx(_dot_)com> Arnt
Gulbrandsen <arnt(_at_)gulbrandsen(_dot_)priv(_dot_)no> writes:
Charles Lindsey writes:
But all the reports so far (not a representtive sample, to be sure)
indicate that no harm arises from multiple References headers (i.e.
they progagate, and are interpreted as well as could be hoped for).
(The software on your own machine is an exception, in that it didn't
propagate the field.)
No, that is not correct. It failed to let it out as a newly generated
message. It is, and was, perfectly happy to receive such messages arriving
from outside, as it did when my 2nd and 3rd attempts came back from the
List.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave,
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5