Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/27

• Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/28
  • Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/28
    • Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Frank Ellermann, 2005/01/28
    • Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/31
• Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Hector Santos, 2005/01/29
  • Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/30
    • Re: Mandatory From field, anonymity, and hacks, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/31

Re: Experiment #3 with multiple Reference headers, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/25

• Re: Experiment #3 with multiple Reference headers, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2005/01/25
  • Re: Experiment #3 with multiple Reference headers, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/26

General considerations for new message field specifications, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/13

• Re: General considerations for new message field specifications, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/14
  • Re: General considerations for new message field specifications, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/16
    • Re: General considerations for new message field specifications, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/18
    • Re: General considerations for new message field specifications, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/21
• Re: General considerations for new message field specifications, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/25

Re: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/10

• References with multiple precursore (was Attempts at establishing harmful conventions), Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/11
  • Re: References with multiple precursore [sic] (was Attempts at establishing harmful conventions), Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/12
    • Experiment with multiple Reference headers (was References with multiple precursore [sic]), Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/13
    • Re: Experiment with multiple Reference headers (was References with multiple precursore [sic]), Keith Moore, 2005/01/13
    • Re: Experiment with multiple Reference headers (was References with multiple precursore [sic]), Bart Schaefer, 2005/01/13
    • Making group syntax do-not-generate, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Keith Moore, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Keith Moore, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Tony Finch, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Keith Moore, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Laurence Lundblade, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Tony Finch, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Keith Moore, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Making group syntax do-not-generate, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/15
    • Re: Experiment with multiple Reference headers, Frank Ellermann, 2005/01/13
    • Re: Experiment with multiple Reference headers (was References with multiple precursore [sic]), Richard Clayton, 2005/01/13
    • Re: Experiment with multiple Reference headers (was References with multiple precursore [sic]), Tony Finch, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Experiment with multiple Reference headers (was References with multiple precursore [sic]), Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Experiment with multiple Reference headers (was References with multiple precursore [sic]), Laird Breyer, 2005/01/13
    • Re: References with multiple precursors (was Attempts at establishing harmful conventions), Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/13
    • Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2005/01/14
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Frank Ellermann, 2005/01/16
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Keith Moore, 2005/01/16
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Philip Hazel, 2005/01/16
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Keith Moore, 2005/01/16
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, william(at)elan.net, 2005/01/16
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Tony Finch, 2005/01/16
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Keith Moore, 2005/01/16
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, william(at)elan.net, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Keith Moore, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, william(at)elan.net, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/18
    • Re: non-standard prefixing considered harmful, unnecessary fiddling with message content considered harmful, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Philip Hazel, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Richard Clayton, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Tony Finch, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Keith Moore, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Laird Breyer, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, william(at)elan.net, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Laird Breyer, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Philip Hazel, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Philip Hazel, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Laird Breyer, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Philip Hazel, 2005/01/19
    • terminology, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/18
    • Re: terminology, Keith Moore, 2005/01/18
    • Re: terminology, Laird Breyer, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Resent- fields, Bruce Lilly, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Resent- fields, Philip Hazel, 2005/01/19
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers, Frank Ellermann, 2005/01/16
    • Experiment #3 with multiple Reference headers, Charles Lindsey, 2005/01/17
    • Re: Experiment #3 with multiple Reference headers, Paul Overell, 2005/01/18
    • Re: Experiment #3 with multiple Reference headers, Frank Ellermann, 2005/01/19
    • Re: Experiment #2 with multiple Reference headers (was References with multipl, Paul Overell, 2005/01/17