ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt

2005-03-03 10:12:21

 On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 23:32:29 -0600, wayne wrote:
  I am really trying to aim toward your first goal.

  SPF, as a protocol, isn't so entrenched that nothing can really be
  changed, but it is far too deployed to make any significant changes.

I suspect you did not really understand Keith's point.

You really do have to choose one of the two goals he listed.  "Trying" is not 
enough.

As it is, I still have no idea what is in scope and what is out of scope for 
the effort.

If you are trying to document what exists, then there is no 'still changing'.  
None.  

If you are trying to document what you would like, I encourage you to either 
join the IETF process, by getting a working group chartered, or come back when 
you are done. It does not make sense to use part of the IETF process, except 
not really using it.


 d/
 --
 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 +1.408.246.8253
 dcrocker  a t ...
 WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net