<20040913121324(_dot_)2416bc38(_dot_)moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
<I415Lz(_dot_)KwI(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
<2025E651-06D0-11D9-9556-000393DB5366(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
<I44oBH(_dot_)95A(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
<20040916154537(_dot_)41cf82e7(_dot_)moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
<I46Lsn(_dot_)H25(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
<20040917125724(_dot_)50a30d09(_dot_)moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
<87y8j8dc99(_dot_)fsf(_at_)windlord(_dot_)stanford(_dot_)edu>
<414B82A4(_dot_)2000203(_at_)erols(_dot_)com>
<20040918050527(_dot_)82367(_dot_)qmail(_at_)cr(_dot_)yp(_dot_)to>
<4155EC5A(_dot_)4090709(_at_)erols(_dot_)com>
<I4p5Dz(_dot_)E2u(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)63(_dot_)0505290150320(_dot_)7726(_at_)sheen(_dot_)jakma(_dot_)org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:23:01 GMT
Lines: 26
MIME-Version: 1.0
In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)63(_dot_)0505290150320(_dot_)7726(_at_)sheen(_dot_)jakma(_dot_)org>
Paul Jakma
<paul(_at_)clubi(_dot_)ie> writes:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Charles Lindsey wrote:
Which existing MUAs have the feature to set the Reply-To field
"_automatically_" according to the particular list(s) involved?
Pine does, via 'roles'. You would set up a role for each list setting
role selector as to be 'Participant' == 'list mailbox', and then in
the 'Actions' set 'Set-Reply-To' to list mailbox.
Does it really allow you to set the Reply-To field according to the "role"?
Certainly, the intention wrt Mail-Followup-To was that users could set
something like those "roles", but in a manner that generated a MFT field
depedong on the "role".
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own
thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave,
CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5