-----Original Message-----
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen [mailto:arnt(_at_)gulbrandsen(_dot_)priv(_dot_)no]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 2:26 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf-822(_at_)imc(_dot_)org; apps-discuss(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
I found the advice rather naïve. Not bad, but also not very
sophisticated, and I fear that extending it to be comprehensive will not
produce a readable document.
It's meant only as a starting point. And I think extending it, if done
carefully, will produce something readable and valuable.
Still, I can see value in a document whose abstract says "here are some
of the bad things you must expect to receive, and not just from
spammers". Is that the goal of your draft?
"...and what the consensus view is about what to do with them," precisely.