David F. Skoll said:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Vernon Schryver wrote:
No, by your own numbers, that's empirically suggested for only 20% of spam.
A cheap test that stops 20% of spam is good.
Yes. *Very* few tests supported by SpamAssassin get rates that high with
few FPs.
--j.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg