On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Vernon Schryver wrote:
No, by your own numbers, that's empirically suggested for only 20% of spam.
A cheap test that stops 20% of spam is good.
If you're looking for a single approach that stops most spam, forget
it.
We are facing a tough battle that will take lots of tools and techniques,
each of which stops a bit of spam. With luck, in concert, we'll be able
to stop "most" spam, where "most" means enough that it's worth doing.
--
David.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg