Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems

ietf-asrg

Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems

2003-03-10 01:20:26

On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Paul Judge wrote:

I'm not fully comfortable with the spam reduction being a third category,
but I am currently not sure how to better classify them. What classes of
techniques did I miss?


Re-writing SMTP (e.g. IM2000). (and no, I'm not advocating that approach).

Matt.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Paul Judge Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Matt Sergeant <= Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, william Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy (Four oracles model), Hadmut Danisch Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, wayne RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Vernon Schryver RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Daniel Feenberg RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Vernon Schryver [Asrg] Need for a Glossary (Was: Taxonomy of anti-spam systems), Anthony Howe Re: [Asrg] Need for a Glossary (Was: Taxonomy of anti-spam systems), Vernon Schryver RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Previous by Date:	Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Valdis . Kletnieks
Next by Date:	Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), abuse
Previous by Thread:	[Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Paul Judge
Next by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, william
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]