ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far

2003-03-18 12:34:28
Michael Ellis wrote:

william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net wrote:

How about criminal charges for spammers (after somebody won civil
suite) with pentaly being that judge orders that spammer may not use
computer or have anything to do with advertising business for set period
of time?

That wouldn't work. Civil charges and criminal charges have to be kept separate 
in
most legal systems. Winning a civil case is not the same as winning a criminal
case. You would have to separate the two and make spamming a criminal offense
before a judge could set those conditions. (which wouldnt fly anyway most of the
time).

On the contrary, if someone loses a civil suit that ends up with an injunction against doing the same thing in future, doing it again is contempt of court, and is a criminal offense subject to jail time.

Why Sam Khuri didn't get hit with a contempt citation and jailed for spamming again is a complete mystery to me. Well, no it isn't, the requisite DA didn't think it worth the effort.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>