On Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:53 AM, Peter Kay
[SMTP:peter(_at_)titankey(_dot_)com] wrote:
I think the proposal requirements are very good. I also think it will be
vitally important to clearly define:
1. what is spam.
A good question.
2. what are the "subsets" of spam that will be addressed per 2.6
A suggestion from some months back.
On Monday, March 31, 2003 10:35 PM, Brad Templeton
[SMTP:brad(_at_)templetons(_dot_)com]
wrote:
8<...>8
As noted, the 4 problems caused by spam are server overload, ruination of
mailbox S/N, creation of fear of putting your email address out, and dealing
with both real and bogus complaints.
3. what is "legitimate" email per 2.8.
Yes another good question.
While we are looking into the eye of the storm with the above
definitions, I feel it will be vital that this group come to some
consensus as to what is spam and what is not. If we can't clearly
define the problem we cannot hope to clearly define the solution, nor
can we clearly evaluate proposals.
Agreed.
-e
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg