On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:43:10AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I'm not an expert on DNS, and I don't know how difficult the
following would be, but here goes...
Wouldn't it be easier to avoid the centralized concept and use a
decentralised like
https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/msg06115.html
instead.
However it requires administration of reverse DNS space (in-addr.arpa)
which is kinda out of fashion these days.
The biggest problem with your proposal I see in the process of becoming
"whitelisted".
Another proposal that uses existing DNS infrastructure but suffers from
the "forward" problem just like RMX is SPF:
http://spf.pobox.com/
\Maex
--
SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg