On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 08:50:55PM -0500, Terry Sullivan wrote
So the point of my posting was: if the effect's big enough to be
detected by a practicable amount of effort, then I can't but wonder
why nobody's ever tripped over it, even accidentally, at some point.
(Phrased differently: given [any] two variables observed to increase
monotonically over time, what would it take for the "true
state-of-nature" to be "huge negative correlation"?)
http://www.honet.com/Nadine/ 'The story of "Nadine"' gives food for
thought.
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes(_at_)waltdnes(_dot_)org>
Email users are divided into two classes;
1) Those who have effective spam-blocking
2) Those who wish they did
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg