ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Asrg] 2.a.1 Analysis of Actual Spam Data - Experimental Desi gn

2003-08-18 14:24:15
As Damon stated in his first and second post on this topic, this is not
challenge-response. It is simply address verification. If the address does
not exist, a 550 error is given.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Knowles [mailto:brad(_dot_)knowles(_at_)skynet(_dot_)be] 
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:29 PM
To: Sauer, Damon
Cc: 'Tom Thomson'; 'Terry Sullivan'; 'asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'
Subject: RE: [Asrg] 2.a.1 Analysis of Actual Spam Data - 
Experimental Desi gn


At 2:32 PM -0400 2003/08/18, Sauer, Damon wrote:

 Just an FYI - My ENTIRE mail volume dropped from an 
average of 50M a 
month  to 20M a month, with the same percentage being 
blocked at the 
content  filters, after implementing address checking (550 
given) at 
the connection.

      Keep in mind that there are those of us who simply refuse to 
communicate with anyone that uses a C-R type system.

      So, what's your loss in legitimate volume?  Do you know 
how many 
people might have had real e-mail to send you, but decided not to 
bother?

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad(_dot_)knowles(_at_)skynet(_dot_)be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little 
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ 
!E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) 
X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* 
tv+z(+++)

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg