Considering I haven't received but a comment or two, sure, I'll maintain
the draft.
With regards to body hashing or anything else, no one is preventing such
a method. It's an option available to individual implementers of CR
systems. I am merely proposing a method that they interoperate.
I am not proposing that CR is a solution for spam. In fact, I have
evidence to the contrary...nevertheless, they exist and are used in many
places throughout the Internet. IMHO it may be an interesting idea if
they automatically interoperate rather than require user interaction.
-----Original Message-----
From: asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
On Behalf Of
david
nicol
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 7:08 PM
To: Dennis Gearon
Cc: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: 6. Proposals - Sender Verification (was Re: [Asrg] Simple
wayto verify sender, track mail abusers)
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 19:32, Dennis Gearon wrote:
Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
Fourth, take a look at the CRI proposal:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-cri-00.txt
Actually, my idea, I believe, takes care of most of the problems
with
the Level 2 CRI system. I will think about it for awhile.
When is CRI 01 due? Who is maintaining it (I nominate Eric Dean)?
It has been pointed out that body hashing would make CRI level-2
work, and this was AIUI generally agreed-to. Yet a revised CRI
document has not yet appeared.
--
David Nicol / kernel 2.6.0 is pretty whippy
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg