-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Brad Knowles writes:
At 12:45 PM -0700 2003/10/22, Justin Mason wrote:
But IMO, something like the PGP remailers and/or hushmail are the key
systems to support this form of free speech -- it should *not* be part of
the core SMTP protocol. Here's why:
I disagree. They are an important tool in the toolbox, but alone
they are not sufficient to guarantee the security and privacy of that
connection. Until recently, penet.fi was believed to be a secure
anonymous remailer -- until we found out that they'd been back-doored
by the government. Who knows how many other remailers have already
been back-doored?
I don't think that was penet.fi. I can't find the details of it
right now though...
But suffice to say, it did *not* sound like a secure anon remailer from
what I could tell. Instead it sounded like a gimmicky e-commerce site
IMO.
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQE/mAnLQTcbUG5Y7woRAg80AKC4WXRurdK57F7vVDp6oXc3eFXxGACfcIbt
aEYJOhuMtyPsZdeH/wAQyQo=
=1KfQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg