On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:31:25PM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
The problem is not simply getting the spec agreed, the harder part is to get
deployment to take place.
I'd posted a short note about that problem to the RIPE antispam list.
I'd ask how much (money, time) the postmasters and CEOs would spend
for a solution. Also, how hard it would be to integrate solutions like
e.g. LMAP into their administrative tools.
No response (but one) :(
Without feedback from that people most antispam proposals are probably
academic :(
IMHO it is important to learn how processes that are affected by
antispam proposals are handled in most companies/ISPs. The ease of
integration and the costs involved will be a major criterion about
hop of flop.
\Maex
--
SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg