I am mystified as to why that is in and the OMX proposal was not, in
fact the rfc editor did not even write back about it.
Do they like it when you propose new amd unnecessary resource records?
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 18:51, Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
This just got published by the IETF drafts admin, another LMAP variant:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-laforet-deasey-imxrecords-00.txt
--
david nicol
"Rabbit troop sucks!"
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg