Indeed. If it were presented under the auspices of the asrg I would
concur.
But my draft has not been published 'officially' by the I-D editor.
-e
On Friday, January 16, 2004 4:50 AM, Jon Kyme
[SMTP:jrk(_at_)merseymail(_dot_)com]
wrote:
8<...>8
Of course, our (Eric Williams' rather) requirements ID holds that
security
must be considered. I'd say that any proposal that doesn't even mention
security can be "knocked-back" right away.
P.S. I think 'our' is ok ;-)
Of course, you're right. I notice that this seems down as work in progress
for the "steering group" :-)
--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg