Re: [Asrg] (no subject)

ietf-asrg

2004-04-28 23:03:43

Barry Shein wrote:

Do you have any idea how many host names, between mail and ftp
and everything else people do, are looked up *per second*?!

Lookups are cheap. Atomic multi-record updates are expensive. DNS is99.99+% read-only. Postage is heavily update-biased.


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Asrg] (no subject), (continued) RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Devdas Bhagat RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip The end result of E-postage (was Re: [Asrg] (no subject) ), Alan DeKok RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Roger B.A. Klorese Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein Re: [Asrg] (no subject), \"Roger B.A. Klorese \" <= Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Roger B.A. Klorese Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein Re: [Asrg] (no subject), \"Roger B.A. Klorese\" [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, John Levine Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Jonathan Morton Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, John Levine Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Jonathan Morton Re: [Asrg] 3 (Message Verification) - Viability of hashcash-based signatures (was: E-postage from first principles), Jonathan Morton [Asrg] Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell

Previous by Date:	RE: [Asrg] E-postage/hashcash - the future, john . oppler
Next by Date:	Re: [Asrg] My take on e-postage, Eric Rescorla
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
Next by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]