Is there a mention in our Charter about the *reliability of transport*?
From what I have seen over the months there is two camps within this group
1/ Those that believe Spam should be stopped at any cost
2/ Those that believe Spam should be countered but not at the expense of
losing possibly important messages
I am quite solidly in the second group (am I alone).
It seems to me that this is a paramount consideration. and this group should
support one or the other to the exclusion of the other. As I see it as a
major sticking point amongst proponents.
As a mail user I want to see a message that I send reach its destination
without wondering if it ever made it because I somehow triggered a spam
filter.
This should include that any system must have a suitable reporting system
(bounce) so that I am made aware of any errors in transit. This reporting
system must of course not be useable by spammers to probe the filter to
break it. Which I understand is a major risk.
Regards
Chris
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg