On Apr 04 2006, John L wrote:
We sure have a lot of raw material. Can I have a volunteer editor or two
to moosh the good stuff into one reasonably coherent document explaining
what we think would need to be changed for it to be good?
I've just read through the threads again and done a summary of all the
main relevant points everyone discussed on the list (see attachment).
If someone with the time wants to rearrange the paragraphs and flesh
them out into a final document, please pipe up and do so. I tried to
relate every point explicitly to the Church draft. Apologies if I
missed someone's contribution.
--
Laird Breyer.
asrg-church-criticisms.txt
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg