-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Levine wrote:
Nobody else has stepped up to the plate it seems. How do we go about
publishing this John? Is what Laird (and my subsequent comments) wrote
good enough as is?
I sent Laird's summary to the RFC Editor. They're smart, they know
what it means.
Excellent.
With my followon comments? ;-)
[Hopefully they shouldn't be necessary.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRE1W0Z3FmCyJjHfhAQJrOAQA82QtBDRvdAUHkDJtskFdw/iTTj99tOou
4PuS9mvR8YZgFRecQXDG83/1KkhPFRj7ojAh5WB4c0j6vo2qztO11USA4VmrrSOt
3V8BntDQt59BEOO407YRuu7Z1v+1xKWjG/4vpYQIHK4aAnHQohTrzPkgo9vsYriq
r2tHVUMeCKM=
=3leK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg