On 12-Feb-07, at 5:28 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
A year is likely to be a typical interval for bulk service agreements.
I'm not sure why you keep persisting on this point. If the criteria
for the DNSBL is something like "a known spammer has service on this
IP/range" then after (or before) the timeout period the DNSBL must re-
check that the spammer still has service on that IP/range, and
confirm that indeed the spammer does. Thus the listing is extended
beyond the 6 month period. It could last forever for all we care, as
long as the listing criteria STILL EXISTS.
I'll repeat myself again: this BCP in NO WAY forces delisting after
the timeout period. It makes that clear - you just choose not to read
that part for some reason.
I'm done arguing this with you now. We'll discuss between the authors
if we think 6 months is the wrong time period but you haven't
presented any decent argument for it IMHO.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg