On 14-Feb-07, at 5:30 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 14/02/07, Douglas Otis <dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org> wrote:
No where within this entire draft is the role of the network
provider mentioned or properly considered. This represents a
_major_ shortcoming in a draft purporting to provide advice to
DNSBL operators!
That's presumably because the draft addresses the operational
processes of a DNSBL, not its policies. Your points are advice on
policy - which, however sensible, are not within the scope of the
draft as currently written.
A delisting interval is strictly related to DNSBL policy. The
draft is not describing how to delist, but specifically when. This
is about policy. Nothing but policy.
Lets be more specific then: Your posts are all about listing
criteria. This draft does not (and never will with me as an author)
mandate listing criteria. That way lies madness.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg