Ugh, I just send a separate mail. Yes, it's clear why you
picked ::2. Now IFF ::FFFF:a.b.c.d *MUST* be treated as
IPv4 a.b.c.d by lists *and* clients, then ::FFFF:127.0.0.2
is the same as 127.0.0.2.
I don't see that in the IPv6 documents, and in any event, this draft
is about DNSBLs, not IPv6 theology.
As I read it, if you want to embed v4 addresses in v6, here's where
you do it, but in fact nobody does.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg