ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal)

2009-06-29 04:41:53


--On 27 June 2009 14:37:52 +0200 Alessandro Vesely <vesely(_at_)tana(_dot_)it> 
wrote:

J.D. Falk wrote:
However, I think an it could, and should, go beyond that. For
example, why is it not in the scope of that document "to attempt to
distinguish or justify any more detailed definition of [the term spam]"?

Because attempting to define "spam" is the very best way to ensure that
a document is never finished.

Finishing a document, by itself, is not a progress in the anti-spam
endeavor, unless it contains useful knowledge for countering spam. I
suspect that if we are not even able to agree on a definition of spam,
there will never be much efficient anti-spam research by our group. And
if people were to judge such research by the spam levels out there,
they'd conclude it's all hot air.

Could we start again, please?

The mistake below is to assume that "spam" is a single category that can be tidily defined. It can't.

The best one could do is to try to enumerate some types of spam. I'd suggest two, that look very different from each other: (a) submission of large quantities of electronic messages to an electronic messaging service with the deliberate aim of reducing the usability of that service, and (b) transmission of unsolicited communications by means of electronic mail for direct marketing purposes.

These are very different - the content is irrelevant in the first, but highly relevant in the second. The threat to the system is the motivation of the first, but would be harmful to the sender in the second. A recipient might welcome the second, but is unlikely to welcome the first.

One might wish to add other types of spam (phishing, viruses, chain letters...) but it's unlikely that even the longest list constructed today will cover all future types of spam.


Let me try the following variation on UBE, in order to see if we can
classify the objections against adopting it as a working definition.

  *Spam* is a message or a class of messages composed automatically,
  possibly using templates and databases of names or words, using a
  list of destination mailbox addresses, and failing to meet both the
  following conditions:
  * There is a record or evidence whatsoever, even implied, that the
    recipient has registered, subscribed, or otherwise solicited the
    message; and
  * it is obvious from the message content, including the headers,
    who is in charge of controlling the processing, and how the
    recipients can amend or delete their addresses from the list (as
    well as any other part of their personally identifiable data from
    any database used to compose the message), where "obvious" means
    the relevant entity is indicated, exists, is normally reachable by
    the recipient, and is effectual to the purpose it is referred for.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>