On Jun 26, 2009, at 1:05 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
However, I think an it could, and should, go beyond that. For
example, why is it not in the scope of that document "to attempt to
distinguish or justify any more detailed definition of [the term
spam]"?
Because attempting to define "spam" is the very best way to ensure
that a document is never finished.
Agreed.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg