--On 1 February 2010 16:57:49 +0000 Ian Eiloart
<iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> wrote:
--On 1 February 2010 14:59:03 +0000 John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com>
wrote:
You're right, for the minority of us who run IMAP. For everyone else
who uses POP, mailing an ARF report back to the POP server may be the
best we can do.
So, are we looking at an IMAP/ANNOTATE extension for IMAP users and an
RFC5451 modification for SMTP users?
Er, I mean "POP3 users"
The IMAP/ANNOTATE is much more
efficient than sending an abuse report, and less susceptible to outside
interference.
Does ARF allow richer expression than ANNOTATE?
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg