Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
2010-02-08 06:51:06
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 5 February 2010 10:52:51 -0500 Daniel Feenberg <feenberg(_at_)nber(_dot_)org>
wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, John Levine wrote:
This is just a general argument against all role accounts, including
postmaster, abuse, webmaster, etc. It doesn't balance the costs and
benefits, just notes a possible cost as though that was sufficient to
dismiss it.
No, the argument is nothing to do with the left hand side of the address,
it's to do with the right hand side of the address. "imap.iecc.com" isn't an
email domain, but it might be one day. "imap.sussex.ac.uk" is not an email
domain, and it never will be.
In the case where the imap server host name does happen to be an email
domain, there's a potential name space conflict. ARF(_at_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_) may well already be
"Cnflict, ARF@" is the left hand side of the address. If imap.iecc.com
becomes an email address, then it would be a mistake to assign a user the
username of "arf".
If a role account is assigned to arf(_at_)poporimapserver(_dot_)example(_dot_)com then it
is a problem if that address is already assigned to a user. It isn't a
problem with no solution, though. Simply make sure that the RHS of the
address is different from the already assigned address. This is almost
always going to be the case for large providers, since machines for pop
and imap service are distinct from email domain names. If they do not, it
is simple enough to arrange DNS to make that happen, without changing any
hardware.
Perhaps another character string would lessen the objection on this point.
The role account could be "arf-submission", although the anti-English
crowd will complain. There is room for creativity.
Note that when I say "pop_or_imap" it doesn't really have to be restricted
to those protocols. The MUA can use the hostname for the system providing
incoming mail, without caring what protocol is actually used, nor is there
any need for the letters "pop" or "imap" to be requed to be in the name.
The TO: address ued for the ARF is simply the role account on the system
providing mail, that will use it to tune content or other spam filters.
Daniel Feenberg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, (continued)
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs,
Daniel Feenberg <=
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs, Steve Atkins
- [Asrg] MUA/Operator reporting address (was Re: Adding a spam button to MUAs), Dave CROCKER
- Re: [Asrg] MUA/Operator reporting address (was Re: Adding a spam button to MUAs), Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] MUA/Operator reporting address (was Re: Adding a spam button to MUAs), Dave CROCKER
|
|
|