On 10/22/2010 1:02 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 10/21/2010 7:53 AM, Chris Lewis wrote:
I think it's worth pointing out that _everybody_ does to one extent or another.
I used to think that, too. But lots of other folk told me it was not true, so I
stopped believing it...
That everybody's spam filters don't have techniques that are subject to
attack and subversion if the stakes are high enough?
I don't believe that for a second. I don't think you should either.
That will remain as long as email has the current paradigms.
This is why diversity in filter solutions continues to be so important.
I don't want there to be a single methodology that everybody uses,
because once that's broken, and the stakes are high enough that it will
be (Hotmail being a case in point), everybody's screwed.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg