On 1 Mar 2011, at 11:28, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Neil Schwartzman wrote:
<aol> +1, and agreed. Heck, I may have even been the person to
suggest this clause, some years ago at the IRTF meeting when the ASRG
was resurrected. Charging for delisting is just plain bad business.
The original wording was designed to cover this, it said (and jeez,
this was back in 2003!): " If all things listed in your criteria for
listing are cleared up then there should be no reason to not remove
the IP address. No /extra/ rules for de-listing.". We simply made it
more explicit (and better English).
That bit (2.2.4) is properly distinct from the CoI/payment bit (2.2.5)
because there can be both inherent and prudent forms of
hysteresis/asymmetry between listing criteria and delisting criteria.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg