ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Rough consensus on pay to delist

2011-03-02 10:30:01
Andrew Kirch wrote:
On 2/27/2011 4:33 PM, Joe Sniderman wrote:
  
On 02/27/2011 04:01 PM, John Levine wrote:
    
I'm seeing no support at all for "Claus'" contention that we should
change the language about pay to delist in DNSBL practices draft.

If anyone else agrees that we should change it, please say so now,
otherwise I think we will consider the discussion over.
      
I agree that it should be changed but not removed entirely. Change it
from a "MUST NOT" to a "SHOULD NOT" perhaps.


    
Concur here.  I think Claus makes a valid point in that expedited
service might require expedited cost.  I am also concerned that this is
in direct contradiction of existing DNSBL practices, such as SORBS.  


Umm it does?
 (FYI SORBS has not imposed any fines since Oct 12, 2010 and the policy
on the website has been updated to indicate there is no such thing as
the SORBS fine any more)

Michelle
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg