Chris Lewis wrote:
On 3/1/2011 5:06 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
While this particular horse isn't particularly relevant (if not dead),
there are a variety of illegal things it could be, depending on the
circumstances. The key is whether the DNSBL operator can be shown to
have _known_ that the delist request corresponded to ongoing illegal
activity. If it can, it could be accessory, conspiracy, racketeering or
other things.
Right ! And finally, IMHO, the less there will be "money transactions"
in the DNSBL management the better will be. Surely, charging the user
for a service perfectly defined isn't a problem.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg