On 3/1/2011 10:31 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
On 3/1/2011 5:06 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
If one consider that spammers money is dirty money (criminal activity
as one said)... and if part of
the DNSBL revenue comes from this dirty money, how do you name this ?
Probably not "money laundry",
but surely not something legal.
While this particular horse isn't particularly relevant (if not dead),
there are a variety of illegal things it could be, depending on the
circumstances. The key is whether the DNSBL operator can be shown to
have _known_ that the delist request corresponded to ongoing illegal
activity. If it can, it could be accessory, conspiracy, racketeering
or other things.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
Those who are not lawyers should not practice law. In fact, this is
another failing of this section of the draft.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg