ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Greylisting BCP

2011-10-18 18:12:30
On 11-10-18 03:42 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:

> Where should comments go? I have a question really, though it might be
> construed as a comment. Why do greylisters match on the (sender,
> receipient, MTA) triple rather on just the MTA? Isn't it nearly certain
> that if an MTA returns for one sender/receipient pair, it will return
> for any pair? So that keeping track of all three seems unnecessary and
> increases the probability of a message being delayed. What am I missing?

As I understand it, some grey-listing systems match on sender/recipient pairs (not MTA) so as to not penalize clustered outbounds that share queues.

There's all sorts of 'optimizations'/variations that you can apply for different behaviours.

You're right, _just_ the MTA would work just about as well for the main use case: bot armies. But that's not the only potential use-case.

There is a danger in specifying the precise details/tuning values of a "standardized gray listing" mechanism. If it's too predictable, you could probably come up with a simplistic mechanism for defeating it without requiring the complexity of queuing. "Hybrid vigor" is a good thing.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>