On 2011-10-18 19:12:18 -0400, Chris Lewis wrote:
On 11-10-18 03:42 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
Where should comments go? I have a question really, though it might be
construed as a comment. Why do greylisters match on the (sender,
receipient, MTA) triple rather on just the MTA? Isn't it nearly certain
that if an MTA returns for one sender/receipient pair, it will return
for any pair? So that keeping track of all three seems unnecessary and
increases the probability of a message being delayed. What am I missing?
As I understand it, some grey-listing systems match on sender/recipient
pairs (not MTA) so as to not penalize clustered outbounds that share
queues.
There's all sorts of 'optimizations'/variations that you can apply for
different behaviours.
You're right, _just_ the MTA would work just about as well for the main
use case: bot armies.
I don't think so. If the bot sends one spam from <spam1(_at_)example(_dot_)com>
to
<alice(_at_)example(_dot_)net> and some time later (within the greylisting
windo)
another from <spam2(_at_)example(_dot_)biz> to <bob(_at_)example(_dot_)net> the
second one
would get through if you use only the IP address. To establish that a
new MTA is "legitimate" you need to be fairly restrictive. After that
you just need to make sure that it's an MTA you already checked and the
IP address is (usually) sufficient.
There is a danger in specifying the precise details/tuning values of a
"standardized gray listing" mechanism. If it's too predictable, you
could probably come up with a simplistic mechanism for defeating it
without requiring the complexity of queuing. "Hybrid vigor" is a good
thing.
ACK. However, for those who have to deal with greylisting (either on the
sending or receiving side) it's valuable to know what works well and
what doesn't. There's little sense in having everybody going through the
same learning curve. So, a BCP should not define the One True Way of
greylisting but list variants of greylisting as well as different
queueing strategies and discuss their pros and cons.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Web 2.0 könnte man also auch übersetzen als
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | "Netz der kleinen Geister".
| | | hjp(_at_)hjp(_dot_)at |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Oliver Cromm in desd
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg