[clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs

RFC1035:
Well it does say should,


See RFC2181 section 5.2.

R's,
John

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Tony Finch [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Leslie [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Douglas Otis [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Leslie [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Douglas Otis [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Douglas Otis [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine <= [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Douglas Otis [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, william(at)elan.net [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Tony Finch [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, David Woodhouse [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Leslie [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, David Woodhouse [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Douglas Otis [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Dave Crocker [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, etc., Matthew Elvey [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, MH Michael Hammer (5304)