ietf-clear
[Top] [All Lists]

[clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs

2005-07-05 03:19:25
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 07:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
RFC1035:
Well it does say should,

See RFC2181 section 5.2.
,---
| Should an authoritative source send such a malformed RRSet, the
| client should treat the RRs for all purposes as if all TTLs in the
| RRSet had been set to the value of the lowest TTL in the RRSet.
'---

While this may address a publishing error, it could also address a set
handling error, which does not provide any solace.  It seems a perm
error may unpleasantly uncover such simplified behavior, if it exists.

-Doug