ietf-clear
[Top] [All Lists]

[clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs

2005-07-05 05:03:28
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 09:58 -0400, John Leslie wrote:
   Sounds like a good time to agree to disagree. I don't think we can
(or even should) hope to resolve philosophical differences.

   How about eliminating the word "permanent":
" 
" The CSA spec shall be updated to state that domains MUST NOT publish
" multiple version 1 (priority==1) CSA SRV records for the same HELO
" string. Receiving SMTP servers MAY return an error in response to the
" HELO/EHLO if more than one is found.

Yeah, OK. I wasn't really suggesting that -- just making the observation
that I'll probably change my local policy. If CSA becomes more
widespread and/or if I become intelligent enough to stop screwing it up,
such that the majority of failures I see are no longer false rejections
for my own hosts, then p'raps I'll change that :)

-- 
dwmw2