In <43A35F61(_dot_)7000205(_at_)elvey(_dot_)com> Matthew Elvey
<matthew(_at_)elvey(_dot_)com> writes:
On 11/18/05 6:11 PM, John Levine sent forth electrons to convey:
Feel free to point out any of your domains that are in this list that
I missed.
I've pointed out a few on this list already, IIRC. Sloppy, just like SPF.
By "this list", I meant the list of HELO domains referred to in the
link, not this mailing list.
They're not on that list. If I give you a list of 24 domains that
publish SPF records, will you use that?
No answer, huh.
I confess, I didn't understand what purpose the 24 domains that John
offered would server. The whole point of the surveys was to take as
large a list as possible of HELO domains and see how many SPF/HELO and
CSV records could be found. Hand picked domains don't mean much.
Besides, I didn't want to disturbe the peace. A couple of posts every
few months doesn't seem to be a good sign.
Let's see. Full adoption of SPF would require about 100,000,000 domains
adopt it.
Full adoption of CSV would require about 100,000 domains adopt it.
So if we factor in that ratio, CSV is seeing broader adoption than SPF.
The survey results I posted here compared SPF/HELO vs CSV. They both
require the same number of domains to publish records.
If you're trying to show that your preferred idea (SPF) is winning, your
results are shooting you in the foot, Wayne.
Uh, if you say so.
-wayne
_______________________________________________
ietf-clear mailing list
ietf-clear(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-clear