...... Original Message .......
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:23:15 -0700 Douglas Otis
<dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org>
wrote:
...
It seems to me that your proposed approach is anything but simple. It
would appear to me that you want to trade the direct, obvious, near-term
benifits of a defined deterministic Sender Signing Policy (I'm not saying
the current draft is perfect) for an uncertain, undesigned, and
undocumented automated abuse reporting infrastructure.
You get to call this 'simple' from a DKIM perspective only by declaring all
this complexity external to DKIM.
Scott Kitterman
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org