Douglas Otis wrote:
On Aug 24, 2005, at 12:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As I said before, let's just agree that there is work yet to be done
on SSP and quite arguing about if it should be done.
We are back to using the term 'it' again as if 'it' has special
meaning. You have made wild claims without providing any
substantiations. Please don't think of SSP as justification for yet
another 'kitchen sink' approach where everything is stirred together
until someone proclaims "RFC-Soup." Now is the time to be realistic.
This should not be about selling a general concept of mom and apple pie.
Since you are confused, I will clarify. The antecedant of it in the
sentence above is the work yet to be done on SSP.
I don't think I'm the one making wild claims. I don't expect I'll
change your mind on that.
Question for you: Is it your view that DKIM-SSP ought to be in scope or
out of scope for the initial work of the working group?
Scott Kitterman
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org