Thanks for your suggestions. I've made a note of them
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Douglas Otis wrote:
This has been called a revocation-identifier in the past. It may be
described as a type of domain-cookie, or opaque-identifier. It would
permit a revocation mechanism and enable opportunistic identifications
that could even detect cross-domain forgery without any mailbox-address
constraints being applied.
Could you expand on this last sentence? I missed any description of it you
may have posted already.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org